Archive for January, 2009

Worth Reading: The First Pick

No Comments
January 9th, 2009 by Mays
Categories: Worth Reading

I mentioned earlier how I like David Wright as an early first round selection. What is everyone else thinking with the first overall pick?

Keep in mind that Mock Draft Central currently has the Top 5 ranked Hanley Ramirez, Alex Rodriguez, Albert Pujols, Jose Reyes, and David Wright.

The BFG league (as I’m calling it) drafted this week (see the results). Chris McDonnell opted for Hanley Ramirez with the #1 pick.

I don’t know if any other “expert” leagues have drafted, so what about mock drafts? Guess who the number one selection was at Mock Draft Central’s Live Expert Mock Draft? Hanley Ramirez, of course.

Last November the 2009 Behind The Plate Expert Mock Draft 1 was held. Troy of Roto Savants also took Hanley first.

The League of Champions over at CBS Sportsline had Jose Reyes going first.

There was also the Early Expert Mock Draft, which featured Todd of Roto Think Tank taking Hanley Ramirez with the first selection.

Did I miss any other mocks? My tally stands at Ramirez 4, Reyes 1, and 0 for everyone else.

My First Pick: David Wright

2 Comments
January 9th, 2009 by Mays
Categories: Strategy

With no consensus #1 pick for 2009, there has emerged a top-tier made up of Albert Pujols, Alex Rodriguez, David Wright, Hanley Ramirez, and Jose Reyes. I’ve heard arguments that, of those five, Pujols or Ramirez should be the first pick of the draft.

But why not David Wright? Here’s how he compares to the other four options:

Albert Pujols
There’s no doubt that Pujols is truly an elite player. But last year, Wright bested him in three of the five categories (SB, R, RBI). There is also a small but tangible injury concern regarding Pujols, who missed time in 2007 and recently had offseason surgery on his elbow.

Add in a bit of an advantage for filling 3B instead of 1B, and I’m willing to take Wright over Pujols.

Alex Rodriguez
A-Rod is the top-tier player who comes closest to matching Wright’s five-category potential. However, it’s clear which of the two is still on the upside of his career: Rodriguez will be 33 years old in 2009, and Wright will be 26. A-Rod’s best seasons are probably behind him, but there’s still a chance for Wright to get even better.

A-Rod spent part of last year on the DL with a hamstring injury, and age-related injuries could continue to show up. In this case, I’ll opt for the similar but much younger player.

Hanley Ramirez
Hanley had 67 RBIs last year. Wright had almost double that amount.

Now, considering Ramirez hit 33 HR, that meager RBI total is in many ways not his fault. The real focus of the blame should be his Marlins team: Trading Miguel Cabrera before the 2008 season left Florida with a barren lineup, and that showed up in Ramirez’s R and RBI totals.

Wright, on the other hand, has thrived hitting in the middle of the Mets lineup. His combined total of R and RBI (239) topped all of the other top-tier choices in 2008. He figures to continue to have opportunities in 2009 with Jose Reyes, Carlos Beltran, and Carlos Delgado around him in the order. It doesn’t appear that the RBI situation will improve in 2009 for Ramirez.

Jose Reyes
As a leadoff hitter, Reyes also has a problem driving in runners, and his 68 RBI in 2008 are not what you need from an early first round selection. I’d cut him some slack if he were stealing 78 bases every year (like he did in 2007), but he fell quite a bit short of that in 2008.

Reyes’s batting average has fluctuated from year-to-year, whereas Wright has logged a .300+ average every full year he’s been in the majors. The SB make it hard to make an apples-to-apples comparison, but I give the edge to Wright and his across-the-board performance.

So what am I missing? Is there a reason Wright isn’t getting more support for being the first pick?

CHONE’s Surprising Young Pitchers

No Comments
January 8th, 2009 by Mays
Categories: Sleepers

Earlier, I looked at some young hitters that CHONE projected as being draft-worthy. Now let’s do the same thing for pitchers.

Firing up the Price Guide with the CHONE projections, you’ll notice that the first several interesting names that show up are players in Japan’s NPB league who are not likely to play MLB in 2009. Although a couple of those names might be worth remembering for the future, we’ll skip over Kyuji Fujikawa, Yu Darvish, Hisashi Iwakuma, and Mark Kroon for now.

Doing so leaves only three names on my list worth at least $1, and two of them are Japanese rookies who aren’t particularly young.

Keep in mind that good pitching is tougher to project than good hitting. Whereas CHONE identifies a dozen or so young hitters that it thinks can succeed in the majors, it can only find one young pitcher whom it likes.

That isn’t to say there won’t be several pitchers who come out of nowhere and find success in 2009. It’s just hard to predict who they will be.

Anyways, here are the three who show up:

Jason Motte (RP – StL) $6
With Jason Isringhausen gone from St. Louis, the speculation is ongoing about who will close for the Cardinals in 2009. Chris Perez looks impressive, but CHONE actually likes Motte quite a bit better (especially for fantasy). The thing that stands out about his projection is a simply dominant 10.8 K/9.

There’s a good chance that the Cardinals won’t pick either of Perez or Motte to close, instead signing a veteran like Trevor Hoffman. Even so, CHONE thinks Motte has value (and it isn’t projecting any saves).

Koji Uehara (SP) $3
Unlike the other NPB players that CHONE lists, Koji Uehara and Kenshin Kawakami are free agents who are both pursuing jobs with MLB teams.

CHONE projects Uehara as a RP, a role that he has been in for the past two years with the Yomiuri Giants. Out of the bullpen he looks similar to guys like Rafael Perez and Scot Shields — solid relievers who won’t make a splash in fantasy unless they are closing games. If Uehara lands somewhere that needs a closer, his potential fantasy earnings go up dramatically.

There’s also a chance that whatever team signs him will want to transition him back to starting.

UPDATE: Uehara ended up signing with the Baltimore Orioles after I wrote this article. Since the O’s have George Sherrill and Chris Ray available to finish off games, it looks like Uehara will get the opportunity to switch back to starting games. There’s an updated projection for him at BaseballProjection.com.

Kenshin Kawakami (SP) $1
Kawakami profiles well with Hiroki Kuroda, last season’s biggest name to cross the Pacific. Kuroda (despite a little inconsistency) put together a season that was worth a late draft pick, and Kawakami could match that 2008 line. Like Kuroda, Kawakami doesn’t have a lot of strikeout potential but can still manage a solid ERA and WHIP due to great control.

Some other guys that CHONE likes as bench players, if they get a chance in the bigs:

Eric Stultz (SP – LAD)
Jonathan Sanchez (SP – SF)
Dallas Braden (SP – Oak)
Josh Geer (SP – SD)
Mitch Talbot (SP – TB)
Matthew Maloney (SP – Cin)
Garrett Mock (SP – Was)
Chad Reineke (SP – SD)
Brian Mazone (SP – Phi)
Daniel McCutchen (SP – Pit)
P.J. Walters (SP – StL)

AVG Leagues vs. OBP Leagues

No Comments
January 7th, 2009 by Mays
Categories: Price Guide, Strategy

Although batting average has been the traditional standard for most fantasy baseball leagues, I know there are quite a few that have substituted OBP. Since the Price Guide can build dollar values customized to both of those league types, I thought it might be interesting to see which players were most affected by the change.

To do this I created dollar values for a standard ESPN league, and values for an otherwise identical league that uses OBP instead of AVG.

Here are the players who saw the most improvement in the OBP league:

Player Team Pos AVG Lg OBP Lg Diff.
Jack Cust OAK OF -$3 $14 $17
Adam Dunn OF,1B $9 $24 $15
Pat Burrell TB OF -$2 $10 $12
Carlos Pena TB 1B $5 $16 $11
Jim Thome CWS Util -$4 $7 $11
Nick Johnson WAS 1B -$5 $6 $11
Ryan Howard PHI 1B $33 $42 $9
Nick Swisher NYY OF,1B $5 $14 $9
Mike Napoli LAA C $3 $12 $9
Travis Hafner CLE Util $3 $11 $8
Rickie Weeks MIL 2B $1 $9 $8

The top of the list isn’t that surprising. Cust, Dunn, and Burrell all have quite a reputation for being guys who see a lot of pitches, and who end up with a lot of walks (and strikeouts).

The names that stand out for me are Ryan Howard and Rickie Weeks. I knew Howard struck out a lot, but I hadn’t realized how much he walked (the intentional walks certainly help).

For Weeks, the increase is not so much the number of walks but a reflection of how horrendous his BA has been. Hitting .235 destroys his value in your usual 5×5, so it doesn’t take much to improve.

Now, who loses value in an OBP league?

Player Team Pos AVG Lg OBP Lg Diff.
Carl Crawford TB OF $28 $17 -$11
Ichiro Suzuki SEA OF $15 $4 -$11
Delmon Young MIN OF $12 $1 -$11
Robinson Cano NYY 2B $9 -$2 -$11
Howie Kendrick LAA 2B $0 -$11 -$11
Josh Anderson ATL OF $3 -$7 -$10
Nate Schierholtz SF OF $3 -$7 -$10
Juan Pierre LAD OF $1 -$9 -$10
Matt Kemp LAD OF $22 $14 -$8
Jacoby Ellsbury BOS OF $13 $5 -$8
Jeff Francoeur ATL OF $12 $4 -$8
Pablo Sandoval SF C,3B,1B $8 $0 -$8
Mike Aviles KC SS,2B,3B -$1 -$9 -$8
Garret Anderson OF -$3 -$11 -$8

Here we have the contact hitters, especially guys who are able to use their speed to beat out groundballs. (We also have Anderson and Schierholtz who showed up on the list of CHONE’s surprises…)

In an OBP league, you can expect that these speed players will be overvalued. People cannot resist the SB totals, and the magazines and websites (which all talk about leagues with AVG) have ingrained in people’s subconscious minds the first set of dollar values. Despite the evidence above, people will unwisely push Ichiro and Ellsbury into double-digits.

Don’t do it. Please. It’s not worth killing your OBP to pick up those extra SB.

If you want to compete in SB in an OBP league, I recommend taking top-tier players who can steal 30+ without sacrificing OBP. Hanley Ramirez, Grady Sizemore, B.J. Upton, and Jimmy Rollins are great candidates for this. Then, fill in the gaps with lots of guys who can get you 10-15 SB. (Bobby Abreu and the aforementioned Rickie Weeks can do it and could come cheap.)

Even that might not be enough to come out on top at SB. And that’s OK. You want to draft the team that can earn the most points, regardless of where those points come from. By passing up on the SB disasters, you should be able to build a team that excels in the other nine categories, and that should be enough to win.

Matt Holliday is a Fourth Round Pick

No Comments
January 6th, 2009 by Mays
Categories: Price Guide

I recently posted on the fantasy reaction to Matt Holliday’s trade from the Colorado Rockies to the Oakland A’s. In general, I’d describe the overall attitude from fantasy players as “Drop him a bit, but don’t go overboard with it.”

On the Price Guide, we have provided several projection systems to choose from. Of these, the CHONE projections are the only ones that try to account for Holliday’s switch from Coors to the Coliseum.

Needless to say, the CHONE projections do not agree with the fantasy community.

It has Matt Holliday ranked about 39th overall, which places him as an early-mid 4th round pick. His peers are guys like Raul Ibanez, Matt Kemp, and Ervin Santana–solid players but certainly not top-tier. In a mixed-league draft with $260, CHONE recommends that you drop out of the bidding at $23. It’s the harshest take on Holliday’s 2009 that I’ve seen.

I’m not saying that I agree or disagree with what this projection is saying. (I do know that the CHONE projections have been fairly accurate in the past.) I think that the risk associated with Holliday may be higher than most people think, though, and this is enough to think twice before taking him in the 1st or 2nd rounds.

Should Inflation Affect Your Keeper Choices?

No Comments
January 5th, 2009 by Mays
Categories: Keepers, Strategy

Yesterday, Advanced Fantasy Baseball posted Ten Questions to Consider in Keeper Leagues. While a lot of the questions are common sense for keepers, this one intrigued me:

9. How much is the inflation in your league? Calculating a rough estimate of the inflation in your league before keepers are declared can give you edge on the rest of the league. It will help you figure out what the players in the pool will cost while you still have the ability to alter your keeper list.

What affect does inflation have on your keeper list?

Let’s suppose we are trying to decide if we should keep Adrian Beltre at $5 or Justin Morneau at $15. Using CHONE’s projections in the Price Guide, in 2009 those players might be worth about $10 and $20, respectively. We save five bucks regardless of whom we keep.

But what if we’re expecting 20% inflation based on the other teams’ keepers? If we throw back Beltre we can expect him to go for $12 at the auction. Morneau, however, would probably end up at $24. Now Beltre’s keeper price is $7 below the auction price, and Morneau is a slightly better deal at $9 below.

So while I don’t think inflation considerations should play a large part in keeper decisions, it does seem it could made a difference. If you are expecting significant keeper inflation in your league, it might make sense to favor keeping more expensive players.

CHONE’s Surprising Young Hitters

1 Comment
January 5th, 2009 by Mays
Categories: Sleepers

You may have noticed that the CHONE projections have recently been added as an option on the Price Guide. These are stat projections that have done quite well in the past couple years at predicting the actual stats. One especially interesting aspect are the projections for players with little MLB experience (or none at all).

Using the CHONE projections in the Price Guide, I generated dollar values for a standard mixed league that starts 14 hitters per team. Scanning through the results, I found several young hitters who have not yet seen significant time in the majors and whom CHONE projects as draftable players.

For a lot of these guys, the biggest question mark for 2009 is playing time. If you are thinking about drafting one of them, you may want to adjust the listed value based on your own knowledge of their situation.

Nelson Cruz (OF – Tex) $16
A former top prospect who has torn up the minors for years, Nelson Cruz finally performed at the major league level in a limited showing in 2008. CHONE sees him with a combination of speed and power similar to Curtis Granderson.

CHONE is certainly not alone is expecting breakout potential from Cruz: RotoAuthority recently referred to him as 2009′s #1 Sleeper. Don’t be surprised if someone else in your league already plans on going after him.

Assuming that Josh Hamilton is the starting CF and Milton Bradley signs elsewhere, the Rangers have 3 spots (LF, RF, DH) for Cruz, David Murphy, Marlon Byrd, and Brandon Boggs. If Cruz hits in spring training like he did in 2008, it seems like he should get the nod in RF.

See also: Has Nelson Cruz Broken His Quad-A Ceiling?

Pablo Sandoval (C,3B,1B – SF) $15
The CHONE catcher rankings have a clear top tier made up of the 4 M’s — Martin, Mauer, McCann, and Martinez. After a large drop below those, you find Geovany Soto and Pablo Sandoval and then a steady decline down to the $1 players.

So what’s Sandoval doing as the 6th best catcher? CHONE projects a .283 average, which is pretty good from a catcher (and better than anyone else outside the top tier). Considering he batted .345 in his time with SF last year, CHONE’s projections is still pretty conservative.

Combine his BA with an expectation for solid R and RBI, and Sandoval ends up well-ahead of the assortment of sub-$10 catchers. His extra eligibility (3B and 1B for some leagues) might not be a huge benefit, but it certainly doesn’t hurt.

All of this assumes he qualifies at catcher next year. He played 11 G there in 2008, but also played some 1B and 3B. Without catcher eligibility, he projects as a bench player (about -$2).

Matt Wieters (C – Bal) $13
The Price Guide doesn’t list him as a catcher, because it looks strictly at the number of games played at each position in 2008. Wieters didn’t have any starts as a catcher in 2008, and in fact hasn’t yet played in a major league game. But if we pretend for a moment that Wieters qualifies, as many people expect he very quickly will, then baseball’s Top Prospect becomes a very draftable player.

CHONE gives Wieters a projection that is very similar to what it expects from Ryan Doumit (which is also not quite as good as Doumit’s 2008). That puts Matt Wieters in the middle of the pack for catchers,

Wieters has been getting tons of hype, but I think CHONE’s got the right idea with a projection that is more conservative than what some people are suggesting, but still very optimistic for a player who hasn’t played above AA.

Ian Stewart (2B,3B – Col) $11
He’s a former top prospect for the Rockies, but the hype surrounding Ian Stewart has died down with some pedestrian seasons in the minors and the emergence of Garrett Atkins as Colorado’s 3B. CHONE thinks Stewart could put up an Adrian Beltre-level performance in 2009, which certainly has some value as a late round pickup.

Of course, his upside could be .305 AVG, 93 R, 101 RBI, 32 HR, 11 SB, which would probably see him surging to the first round in 2010 drafts (ala 2007 Ryan Braun).

One obstacle: He really only got a chance in 2008 when Todd Helton got hurt (and Atkins slid to 1B). With Jeff Baker and Clint Barmes also in the infield mix, it might be hard for Stewart to get consistent time in 2009. Unless he takes over in LF for Matt Holliday, it might only happen if there’s another injury or if Atkins is traded.

Angel Salome (C – Mil) $10
As with Wieters, Salome hasn’t ever started a major league game at catcher, and so he doesn’t strictly qualify there for the Price Guide. By pretending that he does, we get another player who all of a sudden goes from free agent filler to a player worth drafting.

The statline from CHONE isn’t all that impressive–9 HR and 4 SB. But keep in mind just how low the bar is set for catchers. Even 9 HR and 4 SB looks to be better than what you might get from guys like Kurt Suzuki and A.J. Pierzynski, who will both be starters in a 2-catcher league.

There is reason for caution, though. Baltimore may have cleared the way for Wieters by trading Ramon Hernandez, but Milwaukee looks to be sticking with their veteran catcher, Jason Kendall. Barring an injury or (further) decline by Kendall, Salome might not get much of a shot in 2009.

Joe Koshansky (1B – Col) $9
CHONE puts Joe even with Carlos Delgado–guys with low averages that can still knock 25+. Meeting his projection, however, will be dependent on whether Colorado is willing to overlook his tendency to strikeout (CHONE projects 163 K in 497 AB). Not to mention that the Rockies have Helton at first and (as described for Stewart above) an already crowded infield.

There are a few other interesting young hitters that CHONE projects as draftable, that I may take a look at later:

Jeff Clement (C – Sea) $7
Eric Young (2B – Col) $6
Chris Carter (OF – Bos) $5
Josh Anderson (OF – Atl) $5
Nate Schierholtz (OF – SF) $4
Steven Pearce (OF – Pit) $3
Seth Smith (OF – Col) $3
Oscar Salazar (1B – Bal) $3
Joaquin Arias (2B – Tex) $2
Garrett Jones (1B – Pit) $2
Eric Patterson (2B,OF – Oak) $1
Micah Hoffpauir (OF,1B – ChC) $1

Worth Reading: Thoughts on Matt Holliday

No Comments
January 3rd, 2009 by Mays
Categories: Worth Reading

By now, I think that most people have weighed in on the trade that sent Matt Holliday to the Oakland A’s in exchange for Huston Street, Greg Smith, and Carlos Gomez.

Reading through what others have written, I see four main issues being brought up regarding Holliday’s 2009 value:

How much does leaving Coors Field hurt?
THT Fantasy Focus thinks he’s a .285 hitter in Oakland; Fantasy Baseball Dugout says “at least .280.” Rotoprofessor puts him down for a more optimistic .317. I don’t see anyone expecting another .340 season out of him.

How does the A’s lineup compare to the Rockies?
Crooked Pitch thinks that Oakland’s lineup doesn’t provide the protection Holliday had in Colorado, and Rotoprofessor brings up a similar point in its article.

Will he still steal bases?
What happens to Holliday’s decent SB totals and fantastic success rate (28 SB and 2 CS in 2008) when he joins a team that is not known for stealing lots of bases?

The best treatment of this that I saw was over at Fangraphs Fantasy Baseball with Don’t Be Silly, The A’s Don’t Steal Bases. R.J. argues that Holliday’s SB opportunities might not change much in Oakland.

What about playing in a contract year?
MVN’s Fantasy Outsider brings up a key point that Holliday stands to be a free agent after 2009. Will that be enough to overcome the other negative factors?

All in all, there’s a mix of positives and negatives, but most people are expecting at least some decline. (RotoAuthority drops him to the late 1st round, RazzBall says 3rd round.)

Next week I’ll examine where Holliday shows up in the Price Guide using some of the projection systems.

How the Price Guide Works, Part IV (Iterations)

4 Comments
January 2nd, 2009 by Mays
Categories: Price Guide

This is the fourth and final post in a series describing the methodology the Price Guide uses to come up with dollar values for players. The principal explanation can be found in the previous sections: Part I (standard scores), Part II (positional adjustments), and Part III (dollar values).

In Part I on this series, I explained how the first step of creating fantasy baseball values was finding standard scores based on the top 108 players (for our example 12 team league with 9 hitters per team). I also hinted how this presents a bit of a catch-22: We need to know who the top players are before we can rank them. But we need to rank them before we can determine the top players.

The Price Guide’s solution is to perform the valuations iteratively. Each time it processes, it feeds the top players from the previous iteration into the current one. It keeps going through that process until the results from a previous run are identical to the current run. At that point it has found the optimal player pool.

That means that the first time it runs, it assumes that the first 108 players it comes across must be the top players, regardless of how the list is initially sorted. If the list of players is in alphabetical order, the Price Guide will plug in guys like Reggie Abercrombie and (the humorously named) Andy Abad to come up with standard scores.

Even using these guys, the cream rises quickly to the top. Think of it this way: If you’re in a league where Andy Abad gets drafted in the first round, it still makes tons of sense for you to grab Pujols. In fact, Pujols looks even more valuable in this league, because the competition is even further below him than usual.

So after one iteration, the rankings already look decent. The first round players are mostly ranked somewhere in the first round, although at prices that are too high. Things start to drift a little bit after that, but we are definitely a lot closer than at the start.

The second time through, the extreme values it gave to the top tier players are toned down a bit, and the rankings look like something you could bring to a draft without embarrassment. Each successive valuation after that is really just tweaking the draft pool–moving guys up or down a couple of slots, balancing speed and power, switching around some of the bottom of the barrel players. Within 3 to 10 iterations, it has settled on the optimal draft pool.

Anyway, that pretty well sums up the methodology I’m using to come up with fantasy dollar values. Looking back at the posts, I realize that this isn’t the most interesting subject to discuss. However, my purpose for this series is to provide some reference material–not necessarily enjoyable reading. So consider this series as Appendix A sitting somewhere near the back of the Last Player Picked site.

Of course, if you managed to wade through all four parts of this explanation and have any questions or comments, feel free to let me know.

Some thoughts on FantasyPros911.com

2 Comments
January 1st, 2009 by Mays
Categories: Other Sites

A couple of weeks ago, Patrick announced that the Fantasy Baseball Generals would no longer be updated, and that on January 1st the writers would begin working under the auspices of FantasyPros911.

First, let me say that I really enjoyed the work that was done at Fantasy Baseball Generals. Having a pool of ten or so writers was a great way to build discussion and present unique viewpoints.

Taking a glance at FantasyPros911, it looks like the old-FBG commentary is now just one part of a whole host of features (prize leagues, premium content, etc). I realize it’s still early, but I honestly didn’t see any new features that really jumped out at me. Right now at least, the writing looks like the main reason that I’ll keep coming, but we’ll see how things develop.

Also, I see that each column has its own RSS feed, but I probably won’t bother subscribing to feeds that are only updated once a week. Am I missing the RSS feed that includes all of the writers in one place (basically like the old FBG feed)?