Archive for April, 2009

ESPN League Dollar Values

6 Comments
April 27th, 2009 by Mays
Categories: Price Guide, Site News

You may have noticed the latest Greasemonkey script link on the Price Guide — a script for ESPN leagues.

Here’s what the Player Rater looks like in the FantasyPros911 Experts League, a standard AL-only league:

ESPN Player Rater with Dollar Values

With both the top fantasy hitter and the most valuable fantasy pitcher on his team, it’s not surprising that Perry Van Hook has a solid grip on 1st place.

You can get dollar values customized for you own league with the Price Guide. From there, you should see links to add the prices to your league homepage (Yahoo, ESPN, CBS, or Allstar Stats).

Dollar Values on Your CBS League Homepage

16 Comments
April 22nd, 2009 by Mays
Categories: Price Guide, Site News

As promised, I’ve got a new Greasemonkey script that will display customized, up-to-date dollar values on your CBS fantasy league homepage. The effect is very similar to the Yahoo screenshots I posted earlier.

Now, whenever you generate dollar values with the Price Guide, you should see links to add the dollar values to your league:

Greasemonkey links

The links are Greasemonkey scripts that are generated with your specific league parameters, so there’s no longer any need to edit the scripts yourself. If you have Greasemonkey installed, all you have to do is click the link and the prices should start showing up.

This is all still a work in progress, so there could still be a few quirks. Please let me know if you have any problems with it.

Assorted Updates

No Comments
April 21st, 2009 by Mays
Categories: Price Guide, Site News

A quick update: You can now add dollar values from the composite projections to your league homepage.

If your league is hosted by Allstar Stats, there is now a Greasemonkey script for you — available here.

I’ve matched all of the player IDs from CBS with the IDs I have on the stats and projections, so there should be a CBS script available pretty soon. ESPN is next after that.

Price Guide Dollar Values on Your League Homepage

9 Comments
April 17th, 2009 by Mays
Categories: Price Guide, Site News

Having unveiled in-season fantasy dollar values, I’m ready to reveal my latest project — Price Guide values on your league homepage.

The screenshots below are Price Guide values inserted into one of Yahoo’s expert fantasy leagues – the Friends and Family League. The values are customized for the settings of this exact league (14 teams, 1 catcher, 2 Util).

Here’s the pitching staff for Brad Evans, currently in last place:

Brad Evans and a Last Place Team

Some free agents:

Free Agents with Dollar Values

Transactions:

Recent Transactions

It’s all done through the magic of the Firefox plugin Greasemonkey, and it is completely customizable for your specific league settings.

If you have Greasemonkey installed and are at least mildly comfortable editing scripts, you can try out the Yahoo league version for yourself. All you should have to do is replace the Price Guide URL in the script with the URL for your league.

Suggestions are welcome. Once everything is polished up I’ll see about putting it out on UserScripts.org.

2009 In-Season Prices

1 Comment
April 11th, 2009 by Mays
Categories: Price Guide, Site News

I’ve made a preliminary attempt at adding season-to-date dollar values in the Price Guide. You can find it by selecting 2009 Stats.

With less than one week in the books, Emilio Bonifacio is the clear leader for most fantasy leagues. He’s been a five-category star, thanks especially to that inside-the-park HR. After yesterday’s game, Miguel Cabrera unseated teammate Brandon Inge as the #2 fantasy player.

I hope to have the stat updates automated in the coming days. I’d also like to have some way to update position eligibility if I can find a source for games by position.

Let me know what you think.

LIMA, Part VI (Concluding Thoughts)

No Comments
April 3rd, 2009 by Mays
Categories: LIMA, Sleepers, Strategy

So after five posts discussing LIMA starters in 2009, what did we actually accomplish?

We identified exactly one player — Jonathan Sanchez — who should come cheap in 2009 and whose peripheral stats project a dramatic fantasy improvement over 2008.

We identified several reasons why pitchers with solid peripherals might not be projected to improve in ERA/WHIP this year:

- Their ERA/WHIP have been high for several years. (Meche, Pettitte, Wolf)
- Their ERA/WHIP were much lower in 2008 than in previous years, and could regress. (Lester, Danks, W. Rodriguez, Maholm)
- Their 2008 ERA/WHIP was influenced by a low BABIP, which could regress. (Garza, Wainwright, Maholm)

As I mentioned in the introduction to LIMA, the rise in popularity of 5×5 and the increased awareness of advanced stats have essentially killed off the LIMA plan as a viable strategy. It’s too hard to get pitchers who are both good and cheap.

I think that’s why when people discuss LIMA nowadays, they often make it sound like a “punt SP / spend on hitting” strategy. Not finding any pitchers who are both good and cheap, they settle on guys who are just cheap.

But what if we took the opposite approach? What if we focused on good pitchers, even if they weren’t $1 players? Building a rotation with Joba Chamberlain, Matt Cain, Gil Meche, Jonathan Sanchez, and Wandy Rodriguez won’t be cheap, but it might be possible get each of those players below value. And if I can’t have both, I’m going to pick good over cheap.

Draft Inflation

1 Comment
April 2nd, 2009 by Mays
Categories: Strategy

Earlier this week I talked about draft deflation… The basic idea was that fantasy players are going to pay less than what is projected for the lower-tier players. I mentioned two reasons for this phenomenon: variances in projections and focusing on sleepers.

Now, if owners are consistently spending less than what is projected for the $15 and under crowd, then that extra money must go somewhere. Not surprisingly, the money saved through deflation will typically show up as inflation for the top-tier of players.

I’ve chosen to focus on deflation in one area causing inflation in another, but I’m sure you could make the opposite argument as well: If top-tier players are equally valued by most fantasy owners, their prices will tend to be inflated. And if everyone overspends on those players, then the prices of lower-tier players are deflated because everyone runs out of money.

Either way you choose to look at it, I think it’s a real trend for teams to pay more than expected for stars and to pay less than expected for scrubs.

The thing to remember, though, is that top-tier players are concentrated in the early rounds of the draft. If you are in a situation where you expect the prices in later rounds to drop below your projections, it might be wise to anticipate that by spending extra early. You pay the inflated prices when you have to, anticipating deflated prices later.

This common auction order (best players first) is probably also a factor in inflation/deflation. Early on, teams have lots of money and plenty of open positions. More teams will be involved in the bidding, and it is more likely that the market will bid efficiently.

Later, teams may not bid if they are worried about budgeting, or if they already have filled a certain position. Since it is typically the lesser players brought out at this stage of the auction, it is more likely that their prices will be deflated.

In practice, overspending early can be a difficult thing to make ourselves do. It’s easier to overspend in situations where we have already seen the deflation, as with keepers. With keepers, we know we have saved money on certain players, so we know we can spend extra on others.

But with this natural inflation, we don’t actually see the deflation until the end of the draft, and it’s much harder to overspend early. Knowing that teams struggle to do this should be an advantage to those who overcome the psychological barriers, though.

So I hope you don’t feel bad after going the extra buck or ($5) on Hanley Ramirez this week.

LIMA, Part V (The Rest)

No Comments
April 1st, 2009 by Mays
Categories: LIMA, Sleepers

A quick LIMA story: In 2006, I was really excited about the possibilities for Doug Davis. After some early career struggles, he had put up two solid seasons. His peripheral stats made him an excellent LIMA target — a pitcher ready to breakout in 2006.

I drafted Doug Davis in most of my leagues that year. I was rewarded with an amazing 4.91 ERA and 1.51 WHIP over 203 IP — not exactly the breakout season I was expecting.

The moral of the story: A pitcher who meets the LIMA qualifications is not guaranteed to succeed.

Matt Garza (2008: $7; 2009: $8)
Adam Wainwright (2008: $10; 2009: $9)
I’ll cover Garza and Wainwright together, since their situations seem similar: The projections temper the expected gains for these two young pitchers with a bit of regression in BABIP, which was pretty low for both of them in 2008. The net result is a projected dollar value pretty close to what they put up last year.

The strikeout rate for either pitcher isn’t really as high as you would like in 5×5, and that’s the main thing holding them back from the middle-tier of pitching.

Randy Wolf (2008: $0; 2009: -$2)
The last time Randy Wolf managed an ERA below 4.00? 2002. Not surprisingly, the projections don’t expect an improvement in 2009.

Gil Meche (2008: $6; 2009: $5)
Gil Meche is similar to Wolf, in that there is plenty of data for the projections to use when predicting performance, and so their 2009 values aren’t too far off from last year’s. Meche is a solid pitcher who could be even better, but it’s hard to forecast a breakout after eight seasons in MLB.

Paul Maholm (2008: $4; 2009: $1)
The strikes against Maholm are the same as Garza and Wainwright: Expect the BABIP to regress in 2009. The strikeout rate is not good enough for 5×5. Then throw in a new factor: Maholm stunk in his other two full seasons in the majors (2006 and 2007).

Jorge de la Rosa (2008: -$4; 2009: -$7)
In 2005-2006, Byung-Hyun Kim put up peripheral stats that were pretty close to LIMA-esque, and yet still managed to give up an extraordinary amount of hits (WHIPs over 1.50). Jorge de la Rosa — another Colorado pitcher — looks to fit that same profile.

Wandy Rodriguez (2008: $6; 2009: $2)
Like Lester and Danks, the projections are harsh on Wandy for pitching poorly before 2008. However, his surprisingly good campaign last year was not a result of getting lucky, but came as a result of solid pitching (increasing strikeouts, decreasing walks). Were those improvements for real?

If you think so, you could push the bidding for Wandy into double-digits. The projections are more skeptical of a pitcher who before 2008 had a career 5.17 ERA in 447 IP.