There’s no doubt about it, 2009 was an awful year for Kelly Johnson. After two solid seasons for the Braves, his .224 batting average last year cost him his starting gig and caused Atlanta to non-tender him after the season. He latched on in Arizona as the replacement for free agent 2B Felipe Lopez. It seems that many fantasy baseball owners had given up on him, as well. Coming into 2010, Yahoo, for example, didn’t have Johnson ranked in the top 25 fantasy second basemen. The Price Guide, by contrast, had him at a very draftable $7 price.
Kelly wasn’t quite the sleeper that Colby Lewis was, however. Analysts who were aware of good projection systems didn’t ignore him: Grey at Razzball had a very reasonable analysis (although he hedges by leaving Johnson out of the top 20 2B). Tim Dierkes, likewise, had him as an undervalued hitter, worth $6 despite being drafted in the 26th round. And, of course, I included him on my All-Bargain Team back in March.
So I wasn’t the only voice shouting in the wilderness, but Kelly Johnson was still a cheap pick coming into the season. That would change quickly, though: Johnson’s torrid April no doubt resulted in a lot of waiver wire adds in leagues where he wasn’t drafted. He knocked 9 homers while batting .313, even hitting for the cycle for good measure. He’s cooled off since then, but his season line will probably end up as a pretty normal Johnson-esque season: Double-digit HR and SB with a average around .270-.280. That’s a good, middle-tier 2B after Cano and Utley.
I see one big lesson here:
Don’t write a player off after one bad year.
Johnson had a history of being a good ballplayer. He was young — 28 coming into the season — so there was no reason to expect his poor 2009 was age-related decline. While you certainly take 2009 into account, you can’t discard the sustained success he had in the two years before.
Example #2 for this lesson is Geovany Soto: How did fantasy owners forget about a good 2008 after a poor 2009? Like Johnson, he’s under 30 and presumably still in his prime. The smart choice is to consider a player’s full history — giving the most weight to the most recent season, yes, but not neglecting to consider earlier successes.