Archive for February, 2011

MLB.com Fantasy 411′s Composite Projections

28 Comments
February 25th, 2011 by
Categories: Other Sites, Projections

In case you didn’t notice, Cory Schwartz at MLB.com Fantasy 411 recently posted a spreadsheet with a huge mass of projections:

This year I was able to compile projections from 15 – that’s right, fifteen! — different sources, and there’s still one more system I’d like to incorporate into in a future update. However, this spreadsheet only includes players who were included in at least eight or more of the 15 different projection systems, and who are currently on an MLB roster (including spring NRI’s).

It’s in a format that is pretty easy if you want to upload it to the Price Guide to see what kinds of rankings it gives. Actually, you can already try it out on the Price Guide.

Late-Round Closing Possibilities

3 Comments
February 21st, 2011 by
Categories: Saves, Sleepers

Since the projections here typically don’t attempt to project saves (or, like Marcel, do a poor job of it by giving Rafael Soriano 25 saves), I have found myself coming up with some numbers on my own in order to provide fantasy value. That’s pretty easy for 20 or so teams, where the closer is pretty well locked in, but there’s always a few teams where projecting saves is a mess.

While I was working on some comments regarding the messy closing situations, I noticed Yahoo’s Andy Behrens recently did a run-through of ninth-inning possibilities. It’s a good read, and I by-and-large agree with his assessments. I will add these musings on the worst of the situations (where the biggest potential bargains can be found):

Atlanta Braves
Early indicators are that RHP Craig Kimbrel and LHP Jonny Venters will be sharing duties, letting the Braves play the R/L matchups. Venters did great last year in the bullpen, so CAIRO has him projected very highly. Kimbrel also projects to be very good, and as the RHP part of the committee he should be the primary beneficiary of saves. I think Kimbrel has a great shot of being a steal this year and being an elite closing option in 2012.

Baltimore Orioles
Another duo is available in Baltimore, where the closing duties should fall to either Kevin Gregg or Koji Uehara. I’m not crazy about either one: I think Gregg will get the first shot, but I think Uehara is the better pitcher. I’d rather have either of the Atlanta boys rather than take a chance on these two. I don’t see much upside in this situation to compensate for the risk.

Tampa Bay Rays
If you want to see a mess at closer, check out Tampa Bay. There is no one that shows up on MockDraftCentral’s ADP report for the top 400 players. I have no faith in Kyle Farnsworth and his hard, straight fastball. Jake McGee and the currently-injured J.P. Howell are lefties that sometimes get mentioned as options. However, I’m currently liking Joel Peralta as a sneaky guy to win the job and notch 20-30 saves. He had a really good season last year in Washington, and he wouldn’t be the first journeyman to figure things out in his 30′s and put together a few solid seasons.

Toronto Blue Jays
Toronto has filled their bullpen with one-time closers Frank Francisco, Octavio Dotel, Jon Rauch, and Jason Frasor. I think most people have settled on Francisco as the best bet for saves, although MDC still has Dotel slightly above him. Frank is also a great guy to target in Yahoo drafts where he is currently buried in the rankings.

I’ll throw one other name out that looks like a great draft-day bargain: Matt Thornton. I’ve got Thornton ranked in the Papelbon-Feliz range of very-good but not quite elite. I’ve been expecting the White Sox to bring someone else in, but it’s looking more and more like Thornton’s the guy. And if he is, then I have faith that he will be very good.

Is Tsuyoshi Nishioka a SS Sleeper?

3 Comments
February 17th, 2011 by
Categories: Projections, Sleepers

Tim Dierkes at RotoAuthority made a great catch earlier this week by noticing that Japanese import Tsuyoshi Nishioka will be fantasy-eligible at both SS and 2B in Yahoo this year. Obviously, with the lack of depth at SS, that makes him a great guy to keep an eye on in Yahoo drafts.

Tim also makes a bold prediction by ranking Nishioka as his #11 middle infielder — about a $14 value. That seems optimistic, but it counters well the excessive pessimism on Nishioka everywhere else: Yahoo has him as the #38 MI. MockDraftCentral has him being drafted as the #42 MI. That basically means he’s going undrafted in a lot of mixed leagues, where 36 MI (or less) are starting.

People talk about him being an unknown because he’s played in Japan. I don’t see it, though: We actually know a good deal about what happens to NPB players who come to MLB, because there are plenty of players who have made the switch (in either direction). No projection is made with absolute certainty, but I don’t think NPB projections are any less certain than are other rookie projections.

The Price Guide provides the temperate choice: Nishioka is currently valued at $3 — the #28 middle infielder. He seems like a good bet for 20 SB and a decent BA, with tons of upside in both categories. (He hit .346 last year in NPB.) With his skillset, he’s also a great target for the Sweeney Plan — it’s not surprising he ended up on my example Sweeney team in a snake draft.

Why You Know Cano Isn’t a First Rounder

3 Comments
February 16th, 2011 by
Categories: Projections

I was listening to ESPN’s latest Fantasy Focus podcast, where Nate Ravitz brings up this question regarding their own rankings (about the 11:30 mark):

Would you rather have Robinson Cano in the 1st round or Dustin Pedroia in the 3rd round?

Both Nate and co-host Matthew Berry agreed that Pedroia is a better value in the 3rd round than Cano is in the 1st. And, for what it’s worth, I happen to agree. Here’s the thing, though: If you are finding “value” in your own rankings, you are doing your rankings wrong.

If you are ranking fantasy players, the goal is to rank everyone where they are worth. There cannot be an overpriced player. If there is, then you need to lower your ranking for him. There also cannot be a player who is a bargain where he is ranked. If there is, then you need to raise your ranking for him.

The ESPN guys provide solid logic for their reasoning for preferring a 3rd round Pedroia: Cano was great last year, but it would be difficult for him to improve on that season. That makes sense: Typically the first round is reserved for players who have been consistent top producers. However, neither one was confident enough in Cano to prefer him to taking Pedroia later. And yet neither one would back off from ranking him in the first round.

Like I said above: If you are finding favorably ranked guys in your own rankings, you need to make some adjustments. Either Cano needs to be dropped some or Pedroia needs to be raised (or both) until you are satisfied that they offer equivalent values for their draft position.

In this case, I think the Price Guide’s projections are tremendously more realistic: Cano is the top-ranked 2B, but he’s a mid-to-late second rounder in ESPN leagues. That’s just below consistent top-performers like Holliday, Crawford, and Teixeira. And it’s basically where the ESPN guys would seem to rank him if they listened to their intuition and were unafraid to make a challenge to ADP.

CAIRO Update

13 Comments
February 10th, 2011 by
Categories: Projections

This afternoon, I added the latest version of the CAIRO projections, v0.6. It’s good to see the problems with Josh Johnson, Brett Anderson, and Jose Valverde have been fixed, and the projections for all three have taken huge steps toward their expected fantasy value.

Can These Sweeney Plan Teams Win?

17 Comments
February 10th, 2011 by
Categories: Strategy, Sweeney Plan

So I’ve spent the past couple of days talking about the Sweeney Plana fantasy draft strategy for punting power (HR and RBI) and trying to win all of the other categories. It’s a pretty extreme strategy, and I’m a little skeptical of how well it can actually work in practice.

With that in mind, I’ve tried to assemble a couple of realistic sample teams that I think could be put together in a typical fantasy auction or draft.

Sweeney Plan Auction Team
First, I’ll try a possible auction team that implements the Sweeney Plan. I used fantasy dollar values from a recent CBS mock auction in constructing this team. Obviously, these prices would change somewhat if I were actually in this league, drafting this team. But the Sweeney Plan is flexible enough that I think I’d be able to find equivalent players at prices I like.

C Russell Martin $5
C Jorge Posada $2
1B James Loney $1
2B Brian Roberts $5
SS Derek Jeter $11
3B Michael Young $9
OF Carl Crawford $43
OF Ichiro Suzuki $27
OF Brett Gardner $12
OF Juan Pierre $6
OF Denard Span $2
CI Placido Polanco $1
MI Chone Figgins $2
Util Rajai Davis $1
 
SP Cliff Lee $31
SP Zack Greinke $27
SP CC Sabathia $25
SP Shaun Marcum $5
SP Hiroki Kuroda $3
SP Ted Lilly $2
RP Joakim Soria $16
RP Carlos Marmol $12
RP Francisco Cordero $6

I’ve got strong pitchers, with 3 top SP and 2 top RP, plus a few others who I think could be bargains.

My offense is focused on AVG, R, and SB, so I targeted guys who help me in those categories without adding extra cost for HR and RBI (which are worthless for my team). Crawford and Ichiro are my big names, and I fill my OF with cheap fantasy speedsters. The rest of the offense are mostly AVG contributors who will also steal a few bases.

Sweeney Plan Draft Team
To assemble a possible draft team, I looked at MockDraftCentral’s ADPs and selected one player who could be available in each round. This should be a very conservative team; I think a better team would be available in real life. Here’s the round-by-round strategy:

1 Carl Crawford (OF)
2 Ichiro Suzuki (OF)

Crawford and Ichiro are the obvious choices with the first two picks. These are your offensive anchors to give you a solid start in all three of AVG, R, and SB. Ichiro is a reach in the 2nd, but, remember, I’m being very conservative in my estimation. For the 2nd round, I restricted myself to guys with an ADP above 24. If you thought you could get Ichiro in the 3rd, you could possibly take Halladay or Felix in the 2nd.

3 CC Sabathia (SP)
4 Zack Greinke (SP)
5 Mariano Rivera (RP)
6 Michael Young (3B)
7 Heath Bell (RP)
8 Wandy Rodriguez (SP)

With two speedsters in your first picks, it’s time to load up on quality pitchers in the middle rounds. I’m targeting at least a couple high-end SP and a couple of elite RP. Michael Young helps out my AVG, and drafting him in the middle of so many pitchers maybe keeps other teams from realizing my plan.

9 Michael Bourn (OF)
10 Juan Pierre (OF)
11 Rafael Furcal (SS)
12 Jorge Posada (C)
13 Hiroki Kuroda (SP)
14 Denard Span (OF)
15 Jonathan Broxton (RP)
16 Jaime Garcia (SP)
17 Ted Lilly (SP)
18 Rajai Davis (OF)

The mid-late rounds are crucial for the Sweeney Plan. In Rounds 9-18, grab as many fast OF as you can: Bourn, Pierre, Span, Davis. Interspersed with them, you can grab some SP and RP that have slipped through the cracks, as well as hitters at some tough to fill, non-OF positions.

19 James Loney (1B)
20 Placido Polanco (3B)
21 Russell Martin (C)
22 Tsuyoshi Nishioka (2B)
23 Alcides Escobar (SS)

The end-game is where you fill in the rest of your positions. Nobody here is make-or-break; I’m just trying to find starters.

Here’s is what the draft team lineup looks like:

C Russell Martin 21
C Jorge Posada 12
1B James Loney 19
2B Tsuyoshi Nishioka 22
SS Rafael Furcal 11
3B Michael Young 6
OF Carl Crawford 1
OF Ichiro Suzuki 2
OF Michael Bourn 9
OF Denard Span 14
OF Rajai Davis 18
CI Placido Polanco 20
MI Alcides Escobar 23
Util Juan Pierre 10
 
SP CC Sabathia 3
SP Zack Greinke 4
SP Jaime Garcia 16
SP Wandy Rodriguez 8
SP Hiroki Kuroda 13
SP Ted Lilly 17
RP Mariano Rivera 5
RP Heath Bell 7
RP Jonathan Broxton 15

So what do you think, can these teams win?

Attempting the Sweeney Plan in 2011

3 Comments
February 9th, 2011 by
Categories: Strategy, Sweeney Plan

Yesterday I posted an article that described a draft strategy from 1991 — an attempt to punt HR and RBI. It’s an interesting strategy, but can the Sweeney Plan work in today’s game?

Obviously, both the real game and the fantasy game have changed over the past twenty years, and these differences require some adjustments to the plan:

1. The Rise and Fall of Power – In the AL in the early nineties, Sweeney could expect to win SB with just a couple of key players. The AL was a power league, and SB threats were few and far between. Stolen bases have made a bit of a comeback after the power-packed nineties and aughts. Now, there are guys in either league who could top 50 SB.

2. Mixed Leagues – Most fantasy leagues today are mixed leagues, with NL- and AL-only leagues largely becoming relics of the past. This is good news for the Sweeney Plan. Punting power means you are working with a restricted player pool. In an only league, the plan is dependent on getting a few key players. But a mixed league gives you options, and you aren’t ruined if you miss out on any one player.

3. 5×5 – Punting offense or pitching worked okay in 4×4, but 5×5 adds an extra counting stat that makes it difficult to get away with only starting 6 hitters like Sweeney did. However, punting 2 of 10 categories (20%) could be a slightly less risky proposition than punting 2 of 8 (25%).

These factors lead me to believe that the Sweeney Plan is still feasible today, with a couple of tweaks:

Draft a full roster of hitters.
Just like Sweeney, you need to draft a couple of top-tier anchors for your offense. Carl Crawford and Ichiro Suzuki are the two guys who excel in AVG, R, and SB who seem to be must-haves.

But part of Sweeney’s downfall was his reliance on too few hitters. In 2011, I think you fill out the rest of your lineup with bargain bin guys who can rack up steals or give you an empty batting average: Denard Span (175), Rajai Davis (219), Nyjer Morgan (301), Chris Coghlan (337), Russell Martin (250), Placido Polanco (244), James Loney (236). Especially in today’s 5×5 environment, you are going to have to have a full roster of hitters in order to be competitive in runs.

In a straight draft, you can also fill in some hitters from the mid-rounds — Juan Pierre (131), Michael Young (78), etc. However, if you can grab Crawford and Ichiro early, the middle rounds are the time to focus on pitchers.

Trade off excess for power
The obvious disadvantage of punting two categories is that your upside in the standings is very limited. So my second strategy tweak is to plan on trading some of your surplus midseason.

The great thing about trading is that you control how the standings will change. You only trade in categories where your lead is big enough you won’t lose ground. You only trade to teams that cannot pass you in the standings. You make sure your trades will negatively affect your biggest competition.

If you can get 4-6 points in HR/RBI instead of 2, you will have a little extra buffer on your lead, or you may be able to edge out another team threatening 100 points.

Tomorrow, I’ll unveil one possible Sweeney team created at an auction and another from a serpentine draft. I’ll let you judge how realistic it would be for these teams to be competitive.

The Twentieth Anniversary of the Sweeney Plan

1 Comment
February 8th, 2011 by
Categories: Strategy, Sweeney Plan

Twenty years ago, in the spring of 1991, a guy name Hugh Sweeney tried a fantasy baseball strategy that sounds completely crazy — something so crazy no one had tried it before and few have attempted since. And for Sweeney, it was a strategy that almost worked.

The story of Sweeney’s attempt was preserved by Alex Patton in the 1992 edition of his annual fantasy book, Patton’s Player Profiles. Ask Rotoman has the full article, titled The Collapse of Russia available in PDF:

I want you to see what a no-brainer they had going for them; how bad luck and, yes, serious [mess]-ups were all that stopped Sweeney once he had devised his plan.

The plan was, quite obviously, to win in six categories, come in last in two. Had Sweeney succeeded in doing that, he would have had 74 points. He was counting on no team coming out of the auction in great shape; he figured all these old goats would punch themselves silly, and he was right. Seventy-four points would have won.

Sweeney’s simple plan was to punt HR and RBI. In a 4×4 league, he spent big on pitching and then grabbed a few hitters who could add steals and batting average.

I encourage you to read all of Alex’s essay, including his round-by-round post-mortem of the fateful auction. (I realize there’s usually nothing worse than reading about someone else’s draft, but this one is worth it.)

In the next few posts I’ll unveil a modern-day Sweeney Plan to see if it is at all feasible in today’s draft environment, twenty years after it was first attempted.

Learning from 2010 Draft Results

1 Comment
February 4th, 2011 by
Categories: Other Sites

Rudy at Razzball crunches the numbers on a set of 21 fantasy drafts from 2010, to see how winning teams managed their success:

The top players for 2010 were:

  1. Paul Konerko – 61.9% Top 3 Finish (Median=2nd)
  2. Dan Uggla – 61.9% (Median=3rd)
  3. John Axford – 57.1% (Median=3rd, Avg=3.7)
  4. Buster Posey – 57.1% (Median=3rd, Avg=4.2)
  5. Carlos Gonzalez – 57.1% (Median=3rd, Avg=4.4)
  6. Chris Perez – 52.9% (Median=3rd, Avg=4.8)
  7. Raul Ibanez – 52.4% (Median=3rd, Avg=4.4)
  8. Robinson Cano – 52.4% (Median=3rd, Avg 4.7)
  9. Rickie Weeks – 47.6% (Median=4th, Avg 4.9)
  10. Neftali Feliz – 47.6% (Median=4th, Avg 5.0)

I think this stuff is great. I’d love to sift through some of the data that he posted to see if any other trends emerged.

2011 Marcels are Up

12 Comments
February 3rd, 2011 by
Categories: Projections

You can now find the 2011 Marcels on the Price Guide.

The Marcels are a baseline projection system — there are no minor league stats, no park adjustments, no league adjustments. It projects its own saves (I project them for everyone else), and it doesn’t know that Rafael Soriano signed with the Yankees or that Trevor Hoffman retired. So it’s not as sophisticated as the other projections, but it gives a good starting point.

But what’s the deal with the love of catchers? The Price Guide always seems to rank catchers highly, but Mauer #2?