<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Look at the RotoTimes Player Rater</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/another-look-at-the-rototimes-player-rater/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/another-look-at-the-rototimes-player-rater/</link>
	<description>Fantasy Baseball Dollar Values, Rankings, and Discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:23:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: makeempay</title>
		<link>http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/another-look-at-the-rototimes-player-rater/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>makeempay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/?p=580#comment-632</guid>
		<description>When looking at some of the projections the relief pichers have(for chone and zips), there are dollar values but no projections for saves.  I&#039;m in a 10 team AL pool with standard 4x4 categories</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When looking at some of the projections the relief pichers have(for chone and zips), there are dollar values but no projections for saves.  I&#8217;m in a 10 team AL pool with standard 4&#215;4 categories</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mays</title>
		<link>http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/another-look-at-the-rototimes-player-rater/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Mays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 01:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/?p=580#comment-350</guid>
		<description>It does rank bench players at $0, because none of their stats contribute towards the standings (in theory, at least).

If your league buys bench players at the draft, I recommend excluding the money you expect to be spent on bench players from what you enter in the Price Guide (e.g. $245 per team instead of $260).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does rank bench players at $0, because none of their stats contribute towards the standings (in theory, at least).</p>
<p>If your league buys bench players at the draft, I recommend excluding the money you expect to be spent on bench players from what you enter in the Price Guide (e.g. $245 per team instead of $260).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Trump</title>
		<link>http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/another-look-at-the-rototimes-player-rater/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Trump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/?p=580#comment-347</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.  I have been looking over the customized spreadsheet that I derived from the Price Guide.
Does the program conclude that all bench players are worth $0?
Is there any way to tell the Price Guide how many bench spots my league uses?  I think that this would impact the price it spits out.
For my league, there will be 252 players drafted, but the Price Guide gives me only 187 players with positive value.  Is this because it does not recognize the bench players, or is there another explanation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.  I have been looking over the customized spreadsheet that I derived from the Price Guide.<br />
Does the program conclude that all bench players are worth $0?<br />
Is there any way to tell the Price Guide how many bench spots my league uses?  I think that this would impact the price it spits out.<br />
For my league, there will be 252 players drafted, but the Price Guide gives me only 187 players with positive value.  Is this because it does not recognize the bench players, or is there another explanation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Trump</title>
		<link>http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/another-look-at-the-rototimes-player-rater/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Trump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/?p=580#comment-346</guid>
		<description>First of all, this is a great site and a great service, I am glad I found it today.  Quite frankly, your values come in astonishingly close to my spreadsheet values, which I find a little scary, but it also makes me more interested in your thoughts and analysis.
Concerning a post you made earlier, you can get a reasonable base for average market values in an auction draft by laking the lists published by cbs, etc, and averaging them.  Most drafters are going to get their lists from somewhere, and these are what they will probably be based upon.
Anyway, great site, and thanks for the spreadsheet download capability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, this is a great site and a great service, I am glad I found it today.  Quite frankly, your values come in astonishingly close to my spreadsheet values, which I find a little scary, but it also makes me more interested in your thoughts and analysis.<br />
Concerning a post you made earlier, you can get a reasonable base for average market values in an auction draft by laking the lists published by cbs, etc, and averaging them.  Most drafters are going to get their lists from somewhere, and these are what they will probably be based upon.<br />
Anyway, great site, and thanks for the spreadsheet download capability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Podhorzer</title>
		<link>http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/another-look-at-the-rototimes-player-rater/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Podhorzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/?p=580#comment-339</guid>
		<description>Yup, glad to see someone else share their disappointment with the Player Rater. I always knew their positional adjustments were terrible just by looking at how low catchers are valued. 

The good news for us? Many fantasy owners who don&#039;t know better will use their values, giving us the leg up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, glad to see someone else share their disappointment with the Player Rater. I always knew their positional adjustments were terrible just by looking at how low catchers are valued. </p>
<p>The good news for us? Many fantasy owners who don&#8217;t know better will use their values, giving us the leg up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
