Author Archive

Dynamic Prices

3 Comments
February 23rd, 2010 by Mays
Categories: Fantasy Basics

I like to think of the Price Guide on this site as offering a snapshot view of player values. It only captures the prices for a moment in time before the draft starts. Once the auction begins, prices also begin to shift higher and lower.

What can cause prices to change during an auction? I see a few possibilities:

A player below replacement level is drafted.
All it takes is someone bringing up Francisco Liriano or Daisuke Matsuzaka, not realizing that these are pitchers who are not expected to match their performances from a few years back. They are valued at a negative amount — below the replacement level for starting pitchers.

Every time this happens, the replacement level at that position moves up one player, and players at that position lose value. Basically, the supply of above-replacement pitchers has stayed the same, but the demand has dropped (as one less team needs to fill a spot).

A team overpays for a player.
The same dynamic deflation happens whenever someone overpays. Now there is less money than expected available, and prices for all players go down slightly.

A team underpays for a player.
The reverse of this has the opposite effect. If a team gets a bargain on a player, they now have extra money that must be spent on remaining players. Extra money drives prices up.

A team fills their roster with money left over.
Typically, any money that isn’t spent at an auction goes to waste. When a team finishes their roster, not only do you have one less bidder in the auction, but their remaining money disappears as well. Both of these factors will deflate prices for the remainder of the draft.

Are there any other factors that cause prices to go up or down during an auction?

LIMA 2010: Bouncebacks

No Comments
February 22nd, 2010 by Mays
Categories: LIMA, Sleepers

So far this year, we’ve examined how LIMA pitchers did in 2009 and looked at 2010′s LIMA candidates. Last week, we broke down the first grouping for 2010, LIMA pitchers who might not necessarily be low investments.

The next group of 2010′s LIMA candidates are pitchers who are primed to bounce back from a down year in 2009: Roy Oswalt, Chad Billingsley, Jake Peavy, and John Lackey.

Here are their ERAs in 2009:

Roy Oswalt 4.12
Chad Billingsley 4.03
Jake Peavy 3.45 (102 IP)
John Lackey 3.83

Fantasy owners tend to have short memories, focusing mostly on a question of “What have you done for me lately?” If people in your league focus only on 2009, these four pitchers may be available for cheap.

In contrast to your typical fantasy owner, projections recognize that players who have an abnormally good or bad year tend to regress back to their established level of performance. That gives some reason for optimism for these pitchers. There’s still risk:

Roy Oswalt is getting old, and his strikeout rate has never been dominant. The 2010 Astros are shaping up as a terrible offensive team that could struggle to get him wins.

Chad Billingsley walks a lot of guys. With a consistent 1.30+ WHIP, the 4.03 ERA of 2009 seems more appropriate than the 3.14 ERA from 2008.

Jake Peavy is leaving the favorable PETCO Park in San Diego where he had put up ERAs in the 2.00′s for several years. He will spend 2010 in a much less-favorable park for the White Sox. Plus, he managed a 4.09 ERA stinker even with the Padres.

John Lackey is now two years removed from the excellent 3.01 ERA year he had in 2007, posting a 3.75 and 3.83 in the past two years. He also moves to a very tough AL East.

No doubt, there’s risk involved with all four of these pitchers. With strong peripheral stats, however, there’s also the possibility of a big payoff in 2010.

CHONE’s Best Bargains

No Comments
February 21st, 2010 by Mays
Categories: Other Sites, Sleepers

Andrew at Fantasy Ball Junkie points out what he finds to be the best fantasy bargains for 2010, according to the CHONE projections:

1. Eric Young
2. Russell Martin
3. David Ortiz
4. Julio Borbon
5. Jeff Francouer
6. Melky Cabrera
7. Delmon Young
8. BJ Upton
9. Magglio Ordonez
10. Jose Reyes

A couple of names (Eric Young Jr., Julio Borbon) also popped up on my SB sleeper list earlier this year. Many of the rest are guys who had a down year in 2009. Even though fantasy owners tend to focus solely on last year’s results, projections remind us that players tend to return to their established level of performance.

That could be good news for those willing to take a risk on Russell Martin, David Ortiz, B.J. Upton, or Jose Reyes.

AJ Argues for Ellsbury in the First Round

5 Comments
February 19th, 2010 by Mays
Categories: Fantasy Basics, Other Sites, Theory

AJ Mass at ESPN explains how Jacoby Ellsbury should be a first round pick this year.

Regarding those who might prefer Prince Fielder or Ryan Howard in the late first round, AJ says:

They might have mainstream public opinion on their side, but you would have mathematics. Allow me to explain why you just can’t let him get past you with, say, the seventh, eighth or ninth pick in the first round and leave open the possibility that he might not make it back to you. You need to take him with that first-round pick.

Well, who am I to argue with mathematics?

AJ’s idea is what he calls “Mass Effect,” a valuation system that makes Ellsbury the #1 overall player in fantasy last year. That’s right: Jacoby Ellsbury, Fantasy MVP.

Did I mention that it ranks Carl Crawford #2, Derek Jeter #5, and Ichiro Suzuki #7? Something doesn’t seem right here…

Well, AJ acknowledges that Mass Effect has “one flaw.” He explains how stolen bases become less valuable throughout the season due to diminishing returns. So to adjust for the changing value of stolen bases, he decides to knock off 50% of the value of each stolen base.

I’m sure he went through some of his extensive mathematics to come up with that 50% figure, since it drops Ellsbury from #1 overall to a much more realistic #10 overall.

Just to recap:

1. Come up with a player valuation system that doesn’t make sense.
2. Instead of recognizing that the system doesn’t make sense, fudge the numbers some so that they look better and yet still fail to reflect reality.
3. Call it “mathematics.”

I love it.

Rick Porcello Takes the Next Step

2 Comments
February 18th, 2010 by Mays
Categories: Projections, Sleepers

I’m confident that Rick Porcello will take the next step in 2010. The real question is whether that next step will be a step forward or a step backward.

After only one year in the minors, Porcello managed this MLB line in 2009:

14 W, 3.96 ERA, 1.37 WHIP, 89 K, 170.2 IP

That’s pretty good for a 20 year-old rookie, good enough for a $5-6 value last year. But the predictions for 2010 are…pretty divided. Let’s take a look at the negatives first:

Rick Porcello takes a step back in 2010.
(CHONE: 5 W, 5.08 ERA, 1.52 WHIP, 69 K, 124 IP)

Someone recently pointed out to me that Porcello’s projection wasn’t showing up on the Price Guide. After a little digging, I found that that wasn’t quite true: Porcello is on the Price Guide for 2010, but he doesn’t rank in the top 250 pitchers that are shown by default. The reason why is nicely illustrated by CHONE’s projection above.

With a 5.00 ERA, Porcello winds up in the -$16 range for standard league. Why the pessimism for a pitcher who finished 2009 with an ERA below 4.00? Most likely it comes from Porcello’s very low strikeout rates over his two professional seasons. With so few strikeouts, there will be lots of balls put in play. More balls in play means more hits and more runs, and that’s going to show up in his WHIP and ERA.

Even without the impact on ERA/WHIP, it’s hard for a pitcher with so few strikeouts to be valuable in 5×5 fantasy. That projected line above presents no redeemable qualities for fantasy.

Rick Porcello takes a step forward in 2010.
(Fans: 12 W, 4.10 ERA, 1.43 WHIP, 110 K, 180 IP)

What the projections don’t know, however, is that Porcello is a somewhat unique pitcher. He’s a first round pick who has shot straight to the majors, which means he’s at least impressed some people — bad pitchers don’t jump from A-ball to the majors.

Mike at THT Fantasy makes a comparison with Ben Sheets. Like Porcello, Sheets was a 1st round pick who wasted little time in the minors. Although he started off his major league career with middling K/9 numbers, Sheets’s strikeout-rates improved and he turned into a very good MLB pitcher. It’s not an exact comparison, but it shows that it’s possible for Porcello to improve.

That’s the sort of thinking that is influencing the fan projections above. There’s a little bit of decline in rate stats, but that’s compensated by an improved K/9.

So what can we expect from Rick Porcello in 2010? I’m not making any bold predictions, but I will say that the potential downside makes him a risky pitcher to draft this year.

ESPN Greasemonkey Script Unavailable

1 Comment
February 17th, 2010 by Mays
Categories: Site News

UPDATE 02/18: The ESPN script is now working. I’m still adding IDs for some minor players, but anyone who is fantasy-relevant should show up.


I just got a heads-up that the Greasemonkey script for ESPN is currently out-of-order.

ESPN switched around all of their player IDs, which broke the script that inserts dollar values onto their league pages.

I’ll need to update the IDs for a thousand or so players to get it back up and running. So if anyone happens to have already compiled a bunch of ESPN player IDs, I’d love to know about them.

I’ll let you know when everything is fixed.

Can Auction Leagues Make a Comeback?

3 Comments
February 16th, 2010 by Mays
Categories: Fantasy Basics, Strategy

For me, a fantasy auction is like a game of chess, and a fantasy draft is like a game of checkers.

Sure, checkers has its own unique strategies, but those strategies are restricted by the limited moves you can make. With chess, you have lots of different moves at your disposal and lots of strategic options. Freedom makes a much deeper and involved game. While auctions give you lots of choices, with a draft you’re just deciding which piece to move forward one square.

So it’s always been amusing to me that fantasy baseball started out with auctions but has since become dominated by serpentine drafts. It’s like chess players converting en masse to checkers or Garry Kasparov dropping out of tournament play to take up draughts.

Ironically, I’d guess that it’s technology that is responsible for — from the point of view of someone who favors auctions — a dramatic step backwards in the fantasy gaming experience. Internet-based fantasy baseball seems like the biggest factor in the rise of serpentine drafts. (I think that could work as an action movie — “The Rise of the Serpents.”) Technology couldn’t handle an online auction but could deal with a straight pick ‘em, and so the quality of the game regresses.

The Internet causing something to take a step backwards is not unparalleled, I guess. Think about Internet communication — an instant message is in many ways a step backwards from talking face-to-face. You have the advantage of communicating at a distance, but you miss out on tone and expression and body language. It took years for the technology to catch up with the old-fashioned experience — with faster connections speeds and the popularity of video chat. (And, honestly, even video chat has yet to replicate a face-to-face conversation.) But technology can take a while before it compares with a live experience.

Finally, though, it looks like the fantasy baseball technology is starting to catch up. After years of making people rely on straight drafts, Yahoo’s 2010 game is offering online auction drafts.

The question: Can auctions make a comeback? Will people who have spent the last decade doing serpentine drafts make the switch now that online auction technology is available?

I’m clearly biased towards auctions, but I’d like to think that when people try out auctions, they’ll be won over by the superior method. Once people are no longer forced to play checkers, they’ll start to see why so many people like chess.

LIMA 2010: Not Necessarily Low Investments

2 Comments
February 15th, 2010 by Mays
Categories: LIMA, Sleepers

As we look at 2010′s LIMA candidates, let’s start off by looking at some guys who meet the statistical LIMA qualifications, but probably miss the “low investment” requirement. They were good enough last year that they aren’t going to come cheap. However, there’s still room for them to take another step forward in 2010, much like LIMA-qualifiers Felix Hernandez and Matt Cain did in 2009.

The pitchers in this group for 2010 are:

Josh Johnson
Jair Jurrjens
Wandy Rodriguez
Clayton Kershaw
Tommy Hanson

With the LIMA strategy, you’re obviously going to be passing on the big names (Halladay, Sabathia, Greinke, etc.) so that you can use that money for hitting. But maybe you can still target one of these guys as your staff ace. You can get similar production as you would from the household names in the top-tier, but at a bit better price.

With this tier of LIMA pitchers, there’s both good news and bad news. The good news: All of them were very good in 2009, although Hanson’s limited innings pitched capped his value a bit. The bad news: They are all projected for significant decline in 2010.

While I know the math behind the projections is — on the whole — solid, I can’t help but feel that these pitchers are being underestimated a little. Take a look at the projected ERA’s compared to last year:

2009 Actual ERA
Josh Johnson 3.23
Jair Jurrjens 2.60
Wandy Rodriguez 3.02
Clayton Kershaw 2.79
Tommy Hanson 2.89
Average 2.91

2010 Projected ERA
Josh Johnson 3.47
Jair Jurrjens 3.71
Wandy Rodriguez 3.74
Clayton Kershaw 3.65
Tommy Hanson 4.17
Average 3.74

Does that seem a little pessimistic to anyone else? They are projected to give up the same number of earned runs in 2010 as in 2009 (300) while pitching 200 fewer innings, and the result is an average ERA jump from 2.91 to 3.74!

One good sign for their future is that adding ZiPS would make these projections all a little brighter — across the board increases in IP and a significant improvement in ERA for Hanson, Kershaw, and Jurrjens. Based on last year’s results where the projections tended to miss the improvements made by LIMA pitchers, I’m going to err on the optimistic side this year.

So, no, I’m not going to stop bidding on Tommy Hanson at $5.

More Support for OBP

No Comments
February 12th, 2010 by Mays
Categories: Other Sites

I’m glad to see others are taking up the cause for replacing BA with OBP that I mentioned last week. Here’s what Zach at FanGraphs Fantasy Baseball wrote recently:

Chances are, someone reading this is wondering why a league would want to complicate things and switch to OBP, or are thinking about convincing their league to do the same. Here are some simple arguments as to why a league should adopt OBP:

1. When a player reaches base, I want credit for it. It really is a simple concept. I cannot tell you how many 0-2 games it seems I had from Manny last year, where I received no credit for him reaching base in his other trips to the plate.

2. The player is helping his team by reaching first base, so why shouldn’t he help mine? Again, a very simple and straightforward idea, but some still cannot wrap their head around it.

That makes sense to me. There are several fantasy stats that are less than ideal (like wins), but BA is the one that has the most workable replacement.

I’d love to see OBP become the new fantasy standard, so hopefully people continue to bring this up.

Want to Upload Your Own Projections?

21 Comments
February 11th, 2010 by Mays
Categories: Site News

I’m working on a new feature for the Price Guide — the ability to upload your own projections to use when generating player values.

I’m still getting the details worked out, but I’m looking for some people who would like to try it out. If you are interested in testing this out, leave a comment below or email me (mcopeland@lastplayerpicked.com), and I will send you the link to access it.