Author Archive

The Hardball Times’ Hitter Sleepers

3 Comments
January 20th, 2011 by
Categories: Other Sites, Sleepers

Dave S. at The Hardball Times throws out 13 possible sleepers for fantasy in 2011:

These sleepers can come in all shapes and sizes. Promising rookies looking to make an immediate impact in their debut. Veterans attempting to come back from various injuries and ailments that may have derailed their previous season. Some players have found an expanded role with their club, increased playing time or even a better lineup slot. All of these factors can lead to a player being severely undervalued on draft day, and therefore a sleeper in my book.

I think that’s a pretty good definition of sleeper — which can mean different things to different people (and in different leagues). Of course, I also don’t agree with all of his choices, but that’s to be expected if he is looking for names that others aren’t valuing.

Dave names J.P. Arencibia, Russell Martin, Chris Iannetta, Ike Davis, Juan Miranda, Aaron Hill, Danny Espinosa, Jhonny Peralta, Chris Johnson, Edwin Encarnacion, Hunter Pence, Chris Young, and Ryan Raburn as his fantasy sleepers for 2011.

Evaluating the Mayberry Method

7 Comments
January 19th, 2011 by
Categories: Strategy

In 2010, Ron Shandler’s Baseball Forecaster introduced the Mayberry Method — a simple fantasy valuation system named after the town where everything is simpler. The 2011 Forecaster has an updated version of the Mayberry Method.

The basic idea is that each player receives a 7-letter code, e.g. “3425 ABA.” Each of those numbers represents the player’s value in a different skill category. Hitters are evaluated by power, speed, average, playing time, and reliability (the three letters). Pitchers have run prevention, strikeouts, saves, playing time, and reliability.

The categories break down something like this:

xBA
Below .240 0
.240 – .254 1
.255 – .269 2
.270 – .284 3
.285 – .299 4
.300+ 5

So Josh Hamilton gets a 5 for the BA slot; Mark Reynolds gets a 0. Most people will be somewhere in between. Repeat that for each of the categories, and you end up with a 4-digit summary of a player’s fantasy value. Three letters are added to that to indicate a player’s reliability, based on Shandler’s existing reliability scales.

I think the idea is intriguing, but I would make a couple criticisms:

Proprietary Stats – Shandler loves to use his own stats — PQS, PX, SX, etc. — several of which show up in the Mayberry Method formula. He even insists on giving his own names to stats everyone else uses (like dominance for K/9).

Now, Shandler is trying to sell a product (books and website subscriptions), so it makes sense to make his fantasy stats dependent on having that product. The downside is that it makes it very difficult for his ideas to become mainstream. When the Mayberry Method is based on PX, and no one knows how to compute PX, I don’t see the Mayberry Method gaining much popularity. Plus, isn’t it supposed to be a simple system? How is PX simpler than just looking at HR?

Simple Scales – The Mayberry Method is supposed to be simple, because each skill is rated on a scale from 0-5. That’s easy to remember and easy to use for simple value calculations. However, saves only go from 0-3. The plate appearances category just uses 0, 1, 3, and 5. The reliability scores are letters! It seems that for a supposedly simple system, there is a bit of needless complexity.

Excess Categories – Once again, the Mayberry Method is intended to be a simplification of fantasy value. Do we need all three letters for reliability? I would argue that past injuries are very limited at predicting future reliability, so much so that I would be hesitant to go beyond about three categories:

Generally healthy (most players)
Injury questions (e.g. Josh Hamilton)
Probably hurt (e.g. Erik Bedard, Justin Duchscherer)

The Mayberry Method’s three A-F reliability scores are overkill for a simple system (and I would question their predictive value even in a complex system).

All that to say, I do like the idea of a simple mnemonic of a player’s value. I just think the Mayberry Method needs a little more refinement to be useful for that purpose.

Is Evan Longoria Overrated?

7 Comments
January 17th, 2011 by
Categories: Other Sites

I’ve been looking through some 2011 fantasy rankings and comparing them with the Price Guide’s rankings with the CAIRO projections. One player I’m noticing consistent disagreement on is Evan Longoria.

Here are a few opinions on Longoria:

ESPN’s Early Top 250: #5

Razzball’s Top 10: #4

Imaginary Diamond’s Top 20: #4

Mock Draft Central ADP: #5

Everyone agrees that only Albert Pujols, Hanley Ramirez, and Miguel Cabrera are better options for 2011. (MDC adds Troy Tulowitzki; ESPN adds Carl Crawford.) There appears to be basic agreement that Longoria is an elite option at third who should be off the board by the first half of the first round.

It is a little surprising, then, to see where the Price Guide values Longoria among fantasy hitters using the CAIRO projections:

2011 CAIRO: #24

Just for reference, here are his end-of-season ranks among fantasy hitters via the Price Guide the past two years:

2010: #22

2009: #22

So what gives? Even if #24 is a little low, it seems pretty much in line with what Longoria has shown he can do over his big league career. What is causing people to move him up so high, even in spite of his recent performances, which have been very good rather than elite? I have a couple of ideas as I try to figure out what people are thinking:

1. Youth – Longoria just turned 25, so he can still be expected to be improving as a player. (CAIRO should be factoring in aging curves, though…)

2. Pedigree – Longoria was an early-first-round pick (#3) in the 2006 draft. Even if his stats to-date haven’t been worthy of a first-round fantasy pick, his scouting profile suggests a high-ceiling that he has yet to reach.

3. Consistency – In 2009, Longoria ranked behind Mark Reynolds and Ryan Zimmerman at 3B. Last year, he was fourth behind Jose Bautista, Adrian Beltre, and David Wright. Longoria rises to the top for 2011 for being the only consistent top-tier 3B over the past couple years. (Can that launch him to the beginning of the first round, though?)

4. Skillset – In 2009, Longoria bashed 33 HR. In 2010, the power went down (22 HR), but that was balanced by gains in AVG and SB. Assuming Longoria is capable of all three skills, putting the three together would make him a top-tier player. (.300 AVG, 30 HR, 15 SB is basically a better Matt Holliday…)

5. Hot starts – In both of his two full seasons in the majors, Longoria has been terrific in April and May. Early in the season, he has frequently been the most valuable fantasy player according to the Price Guide. Maybe the prognosticators are remembering his early-season heroics too favorably. Or, they are seeing those months as closer to Longoria’s true talent, and are waiting for the season without a cool stretch in late summer.

I don’t know which of those reasons people are using to rank Longoria so favorably, or if it is some combination of them. But what is it I’m missing on Evan Longoria?

Valuing Middle Relievers

No Comments
January 15th, 2011 by
Categories: Strategy

This week brought news that the New York Yankees signed Rafael Soriano, a move that appears to make Soriano a very highly-paid 8th inning man for 2011. It’s a signing that is huge for the fantasy value for the guy who led the league in saves last year: After the news broke, I adjusted Soriano’s projected save totals on the Price Guide from 36 to a still-optimistic 12 saves.

Amazingly, the Price Guide thinks Soriano is still pretty valuable. Despite having only half or a third of their save numbers, with the default setup he ranks above closers like David Aardsma, Francisco Cordero, Andrew Bailey, and Huston Street. The difference is in ERA/WHIP: All of those guys with a 9th-inning role have ERAs projected above 3.60 and many have unimpressive WHIPs (e.g. Cordero’s projected 1.36 WHIP). CAIRO thinks Soriano can do much better than that (3.14 ERA, 1.00 WHIP).

This is an excellent reminder of the value of middle relievers in fantasy. Do you think Soriano will really cost more in your draft than a guy like Aardsma or Cordero? I think fantasy drafters have an easier time of comprehending the value to their team of a counting stat (35 saves) than a rate stat (1.00 WHIP). When the Price Guide does the heavy lifting, however, it sees a top-notch middle-reliever who can vulture saves to be just as valuable as a lot of guys with 30+ saves.

And for keeper leagues: Rafael Soriano has a good chance to be back at 40 saves in 2012.

Projecting Playing Time

3 Comments
January 14th, 2011 by
Categories: Projections, Site News

I mentioned last week that one of my goals for this fantasy draft season is to add playing time projections early on. Today I’ve added a new checkbox to the Price Guide setup screen: Adjust for playing time.

Here’s what I’ve done:

- I started with FanGraphs’ Community Forecasts for Plate Appearances (PA) and Innings Pitched (IP). I lowered the pitchers’ totals across the board, though: They seemed too high by 10-15%. FanGraphs, however, is missing lots of players who would need to be projected for fantasy baseball.

- Next, I checked the depth charts for every team at MLBDepthCharts.com. I added every player who showed up on a team’s projected roster. Those that didn’t have a FanGraphs projection I gave a base projection of 350 PA for hitters, 140 IP for SP, and 45 IP for RP.

- The last step is the hardest, and the one where I’d appreciate your input. I need to go though and bump up guys above the baseline if they will realistically get more playing time. I need to add minor leaguers who won’t be on a team’s opening day roster but who do have a chance at a midseason callup. This is going to be a tedious process of looking at each player’s recent history and adjusting their 2011 playing time to a realistic projection.

So if you have a favorite team, you might glance through the projections to see if you can find any particularly egregious mistakes.

CAIRO’s 2011 Sleepers

5 Comments
January 10th, 2011 by
Categories: Projections, Sleepers

I always find it interesting to scan through the first projections of the year, because there are always a few players with positive dollar values whom I know nothing about. These guys are not usually the big name prospects, but they are guys who could provide a little value for an end-game selection, if their situation looks promising in the spring.

I’ve discovered the past two years that it’s pretty safe to ignore the no-name catchers who crop up on the Price Guide rankings; catcher is a weak position offensively so its possible to have MLB-caliber batting (and be lacking the MLB-caliber defense).

The other type of player who tends to show up are Rockies, whose hitting projections look better because the ballpark is factored in. They aren’t good hitters; they are just projected in a good ballpark.

Ignoring those guys, the top couple of sleepers I see are:

Zack Cozart (Cin – SS) $12
Looking at Cincinnati’s depth chart, shortstop looks like a depressing position for 2011. Early on, it looked like Paul Janish would be getting the primary nod, but the recent signing of Edgar Renteria changes that a bit. Renteria hasn’t had much fantasy impact over the past couple of years, but it seems likely he’ll be seeing time at short, regardless.

The projections, however, like Zack Cozart better than either Janish or Renteria. Cozart’s lack of contact hitting would make him a liability in AVG, but CAIRO puts him at a decent bet for a 20-20 season if given playing time. (A line oddly similar to fellow-Red Drew Stubbs‘s skillset, except at SS.)

I’m not holding out for Cozart to get a fulltime job with the major league team, though. Especially not with a veteran (and World Series MVP!) like Renteria earning a paycheck from the Reds. He’s more of a name to know in case of injury or a hot start in the minors.

Brandon Belt (SF – 1B) $10
Unlike Cozart, Brandon Belt has actually turned into a decent prospect. He’s a fifth round pick from 2009 who, after a solid year in the minors, has become the Giants’ #1 prospect. He’s got a bit of pop and a bit of speed, which would make him a well-rounded, low-end player for 2011. In keeper leagues he has the upside to be even more valuable beyond 2011, as well.

One issue with Belt is the presence of Aubrey Huff at firstbase. Huff, however, could be used in the outfield if Belt is pushing for a job. Belt has also been moved quickly through the minors, so I could see the Giants starting him off in AAA to begin the year. A good spring could mean Belt comes up sooner than later, though.

What’s Changed for 2011?

17 Comments
January 6th, 2011 by
Categories: Projections

As the fantasy baseball draft season gets underway, I’d like to survey the landscape and see what has changed since last year.

Playing Time Projections
Community playing time projections were an eyeopener for me last year. Combining computer projections for rates with a human understanding of each team’s situation was a huge step forward for accuracy. I’d like to add the ability to adjust any projections for playing time, and I’d like to find some way to get playing time estimates earlier this year.

No more CHONE
Sean announced he has a gig for a real team, which means there won’t be any 2011 CHONE projections. CHONE has been a staple here for the last couple of years. Not only was it a very accurate system, it typically came out early (December) and gave valuable projections for guys coming from Japan’s NPB league (e.g. Colby Lewis in 2010). Losing CHONE affects the composite projections, and so I’m going to be needing to look for new sources this year.

Oliver Improvements
The Hardball Times has definitely improved their Oliver projections for 2011, adding in a dollar value calculator similar to what the Price Guide is doing. They had already been doing custom playing time projections, which I mentioned above as a key element for accuracy. Yeah, it’s $15, but, of the various non-free options, I think it has the most going for it. Even without the price difference, I’d much rather have THT’s Forecasts than Baseball Prospectus’s Fantasy package ($20; with PECOTA surviving on reputation) or Shandler’s Baseball Forecaster ($25; with rehashed articles and no custom calculator).

What else has changed for fantasy drafts in 2011?

The First Projections of 2011: CAIRO

4 Comments
January 5th, 2011 by
Categories: Uncategorized

Early fantasy drafters get ready: The Price Guide has its first 2011 Projections, SG’s CAIRO projections. Yankees fans already know about the excellent Replacement Level Yankees Weblog where SG posts. We non-Yankee fans can still find some great projection info at RLYW, like SG’s explanation of the CAIRO methodology and his 2011 projected standings (updated throughout the preseason).

Evaluating 2010: Kelly Johnson

2 Comments
August 30th, 2010 by
Categories: Projections, Sleepers

There’s no doubt about it, 2009 was an awful year for Kelly Johnson. After two solid seasons for the Braves, his .224 batting average last year cost him his starting gig and caused Atlanta to non-tender him after the season. He latched on in Arizona as the replacement for free agent 2B Felipe Lopez. It seems that many fantasy baseball owners had given up on him, as well. Coming into 2010, Yahoo, for example, didn’t have Johnson ranked in the top 25 fantasy second basemen. The Price Guide, by contrast, had him at a very draftable $7 price.

Kelly wasn’t quite the sleeper that Colby Lewis was, however. Analysts who were aware of good projection systems didn’t ignore him: Grey at Razzball had a very reasonable analysis (although he hedges by leaving Johnson out of the top 20 2B). Tim Dierkes, likewise, had him as an undervalued hitter, worth $6 despite being drafted in the 26th round. And, of course, I included him on my All-Bargain Team back in March.

So I wasn’t the only voice shouting in the wilderness, but Kelly Johnson was still a cheap pick coming into the season. That would change quickly, though: Johnson’s torrid April no doubt resulted in a lot of waiver wire adds in leagues where he wasn’t drafted. He knocked 9 homers while batting .313, even hitting for the cycle for good measure. He’s cooled off since then, but his season line will probably end up as a pretty normal Johnson-esque season: Double-digit HR and SB with a average around .270-.280. That’s a good, middle-tier 2B after Cano and Utley.

I see one big lesson here:

Don’t write a player off after one bad year.

Johnson had a history of being a good ballplayer. He was young — 28 coming into the season — so there was no reason to expect his poor 2009 was age-related decline. While you certainly take 2009 into account, you can’t discard the sustained success he had in the two years before.

Example #2 for this lesson is Geovany Soto: How did fantasy owners forget about a good 2008 after a poor 2009? Like Johnson, he’s under 30 and presumably still in his prime. The smart choice is to consider a player’s full history — giving the most weight to the most recent season, yes, but not neglecting to consider earlier successes.

Evaluating 2010: Colby Lewis

1 Comment
August 27th, 2010 by
Categories: Projections, Sleepers

Colby Lewis was probably my favorite sleeper coming into 2010. His signing with the Rangers from the Japanese NPB league was completely unnoticed by fantasy magazines. Yahoo had him ranked as the 339th best player for 2010 — irrelevant for mixed leagues. I’ve searched back through articles and posts from this winter, and I didn’t find much hype from Internet writers, either. (Consider the lack of optimism from this Fantasy Roundtable in early April, although even that was too late for drafting.)

Yet in January 2010, I wrote a post entitled “Johan Santana, Josh Beckett and…Colby Lewis” highlighting a projection that put Colby Lewis in the ballpark of those two perennial stars. Lewis was the most surprising name to me when I ran the initial CHONE projections through the Price Guide. CHONE predicted a 3.96 ERA, 1.20 WHIP, and 8.0 K/9 (although Sean later adjusted it more conservatively to account for Lewis’s poor MLB seasons from several years ago).

Although my post was not as strong a recommendation as that title makes it sound, I did conclude with this line:

Even using the more pessimistic ZiPS, I feel pretty good about paying at least $5-6 for Colby Lewis. At that price, it’s not a big deal to cut him if he doesn’t work out. If it turns out CHONE is right, then that’s a cheap bet that could pay huge dividends.

Basically, Colby Lewis is the kind of risk you take that helps win your league. He offered little downside as a late round, $1 pick, and he had plenty of upside. That $1 pick has (to date) netted about $12 of value in a standard league in 2010, and great keeper value for 2011 and beyond.

What are the lessons here?

Pay attention to NPB stars coming to MLB.
Sure, everyone notices guys like Daisuke Matsuzaka and their huge posting fees. Watch for guys (like Hiroki Kuroda recently) who might not project as stars but who do look like fantasy contributors, especially since these guys will come so much cheaper at the draft than the Matsuzakas will. Note: As in the case of Lewis, the guys without Japanese-sounding names may even get less attention.

Don’t be afraid to use your final picks on high-upside players
At the end of the draft, you are basically just rounding out your roster or filling your bench. You can target reliable veterans — maybe this year it would be guys like Vicente Padilla or Tim Wakefield — who have clear flaws but don’t project to be horrendous. Or, you can take a gamble on a player who might be terrible, but who also has a good chance of turning a profit.

At 2010 drafts, guys like Colby Lewis were the exact kind of sleeper to target if you wanted endgame players who could push you towards a winning season.