SubscribeYes, fantasy baseball magazines, the item that fantasy players love to hate. Magazines have become the symbol of the fantasy-ignorant — the staple of the unprepared.
And yet, despite their poor reputation, fantasy magazines seem to be selling quite well: There’s apparently enough of a market for fantasy mags to support a half dozen different publications. I realize that there are plenty of casual fantasy fans out there to profit from, but I suspect that there are quite a few magazines sold to the “magazine-haters” as well.
I’ve heard your excuses:
“Well, I only buy it because there’s nothing else to read in the winter.”
“I only get it to give me something to read ‘away from my computer.’”
Sure you do. The truth is, while magazines are admittedly horribly out of date by April, most of them are actually pretty good at what they do. The depth of coverage is not always the best, but I don’t think that’s their point. Much of the content is contributed by high-quality writers, and is, in my opinion at least, pretty high quality.
So for those of us who can appreciate the magazines for what they offer, let’s take a look at what’s available. When I checked at my local bookstore, I found these three magazines on the rack:
The Fantasy Baseball Guide ($6.99)
The Fantasy Baseball Guide is chiefly the work of Peter “Rotoman” Kreutzer, and that alone has been enough to get me to buy it in the past. It isn’t as flashy as other magazines–don’t expect glossy pages and fancy layouts–but I think the content is top notch.
However, I hadn’t really noticed until I compared it directly to other publications, but the Guide doesn’t have nearly the features of other magazines. Some of those features are just fluff, but some of them can be useful. It is a little cheaper than other mags, so I’d weigh the price in with how interested you are in sleeper/bust list or mock auctions.
Another weakness of the Guide is that it only has 4×4 dollar values. I’m sure a lot of leagues out there are still doing 4×4, but it doesn’t seem to be that common anymore. Maybe their wanting to establish their old-school credentials, but I’d think 5×5 would be pretty easy to add in.
Fanball ($7.99)
Of the three magazines I looked at, Fanball clearly had the best range of features. In addition to the standard player stats and handful of articles, Fanball’s magazine had a mock auction, a mixed-league mock draft, and AL-only and NL-only mock drafts.* There were dollar value cheat sheets for several league configurations. Team-by-team breakdowns, sleepers, busts,
*The latter two didn’t seem that helpful to me… There is just too much that is unknown in November (e.g. free agents) for an NL-only or AL-only draft to make sense: What good is an AL-only draft that doesn’t take Sabathia or Teixeira?
Those familiar with The Bull Pen forums will recognize the work of Jason Collette, whose contributions here are solid. In fact, the writers overall seem like a respectable crew.
Of the magazines I looked at, the Fanball publication would probably get my vote for favorite.
Lindy’s Fantasy Baseball ($7.99)
By the time I got to my third (and final) magazine, I’m starting to see just how similar the magazines are. While I think it can be worthwhile to pick up a magazine, I don’t see much point of getting more than that.
One unique feature of Lindy’s that caught my eye was an article by Yahoo’s Andy Behrens discussing “Roster Churn.” It’s a look at which players were most likely to end up on winning teams last year; definitely worth reading.
Otherwise, Fanball’s fuller feature set (and equal price) would make me lean towards that one instead of Lindy’s.
I’ll keep checking around town in the next couple of months to see if I come across any other magazines. Right now Fanball’s magazine is the best I’ve seen.
Related posts:
As much as the analysis will sometimes drive me crazy, I am definitely one of those who will buy a guide so I have something to read in bed and a comprehensive list of players. I’ve been partial to the Rotomang guide the last few years, as their writers seem to be a little more aware of things like BABiP and “regression to the mean” and whatnot. And the projections usually seem pretty reasonable.