<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pairing Your First Two Picks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/pairing-your-first-two-picks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/pairing-your-first-two-picks/</link>
	<description>Fantasy Baseball Dollar Values, Rankings, and Discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:39:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/pairing-your-first-two-picks/#comment-6798</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/?p=1119#comment-6798</guid>
		<description>At a quick, first glance it seems to have suppressed the dollar value of alot of the &#039;top end&#039; players by $10+.

The dollar value &#039;band&#039; is also alot tighter (now $27 is the top hitter in my league vs. $43 previously) then it was before.

Other than the &#039;top end&#039; players though the values do seem to be slightly more accurate in my opinion.

Again, this is just based off a quick 5 minute glance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a quick, first glance it seems to have suppressed the dollar value of alot of the &#8216;top end&#8217; players by $10+.</p>
<p>The dollar value &#8216;band&#8217; is also alot tighter (now $27 is the top hitter in my league vs. $43 previously) then it was before.</p>
<p>Other than the &#8216;top end&#8217; players though the values do seem to be slightly more accurate in my opinion.</p>
<p>Again, this is just based off a quick 5 minute glance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mays</title>
		<link>http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/pairing-your-first-two-picks/#comment-6796</link>
		<dc:creator>Mays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/?p=1119#comment-6796</guid>
		<description>@Mike: You haven&#039;t missed anything; the post will be tomorrow.

I&#039;m currently playing around with adjusting the projections by playing time.  The &quot;2010 Composite (Adj.)&quot; projections are an early attempt at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike: You haven&#8217;t missed anything; the post will be tomorrow.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m currently playing around with adjusting the projections by playing time.  The &#8220;2010 Composite (Adj.)&#8221; projections are an early attempt at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/pairing-your-first-two-picks/#comment-6789</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/?p=1119#comment-6789</guid>
		<description>The last two years in our league, we&#039;ve known our draft position a few days before the draft and I&#039;ve used this knowledge to script options for my first 4 or 5 rounds (We play simultaneous AL and NL-only roto leagues). I find this to be a big help when the draft starts to unfold... I&#039;ve played out the scenarios to 4 or 5 rounds and don&#039;t have to scramble in my 90 second window to decide who next after a guy I was hoping to get in round 2 goes off the board right before me. I try to be realistic when doing this - looking at ADPs and not just hoping a guy will fall 5 spots to me. It really helps me not reach for players when I know that 1 or 2 rounds later I can get similar production and should instead draft a positionally or statistically scarce player.

T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last two years in our league, we&#8217;ve known our draft position a few days before the draft and I&#8217;ve used this knowledge to script options for my first 4 or 5 rounds (We play simultaneous AL and NL-only roto leagues). I find this to be a big help when the draft starts to unfold&#8230; I&#8217;ve played out the scenarios to 4 or 5 rounds and don&#8217;t have to scramble in my 90 second window to decide who next after a guy I was hoping to get in round 2 goes off the board right before me. I try to be realistic when doing this &#8211; looking at ADPs and not just hoping a guy will fall 5 spots to me. It really helps me not reach for players when I know that 1 or 2 rounds later I can get similar production and should instead draft a positionally or statistically scarce player.</p>
<p>T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Adamson</title>
		<link>http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/pairing-your-first-two-picks/#comment-6785</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Adamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/?p=1119#comment-6785</guid>
		<description>Makes sense to me too. What I&#039;d really like to know though is what&#039;s up with the 2010 Composite (Adj) data on the Price Guide. Did I miss a post somewhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes sense to me too. What I&#8217;d really like to know though is what&#8217;s up with the 2010 Composite (Adj) data on the Price Guide. Did I miss a post somewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
