<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Playing with Marcel&#8217;s Reliability Ratings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/playing-with-marcels-reliability-ratings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/playing-with-marcels-reliability-ratings/</link>
	<description>Fantasy Baseball Dollar Values, Rankings, and Discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:33:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mays</title>
		<link>http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/playing-with-marcels-reliability-ratings/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Mays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/?p=420#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Also if anyone wants to try out the reliability scores on the Price Guide, just add &quot;&amp;rel=Y&quot; to the end of the address when you build values.  Only works for Marcel, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also if anyone wants to try out the reliability scores on the Price Guide, just add &#8220;&amp;rel=Y&#8221; to the end of the address when you build values.  Only works for Marcel, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mays</title>
		<link>http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/playing-with-marcels-reliability-ratings/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Mays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/?p=420#comment-134</guid>
		<description>I just multiplied each player&#039;s adjusted total score by the reliability factor.

It would be nice for fantasy owners if Gordon had a lower reliability, but the truth is that he has established a very low level of play over an extended period.  In a lot of cases, you&#039;re better off with the devil you don&#039;t know instead of the one that you do. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just multiplied each player&#8217;s adjusted total score by the reliability factor.</p>
<p>It would be nice for fantasy owners if Gordon had a lower reliability, but the truth is that he has established a very low level of play over an extended period.  In a lot of cases, you&#8217;re better off with the devil you don&#8217;t know instead of the one that you do. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/playing-with-marcels-reliability-ratings/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastplayerpicked.com/?p=420#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Very interesting.  I&#039;m wondering how exactly you incorporated the reliability scores.  Did you multiply the dollar value by the reliability?  Or multiply everyone&#039;s stat lines?

One other thought I had was making reliability a separate category, although would be some problems with that.

Reliability is a weird thing though, because as I understand it, having a higher reliability isn&#039;t always a good thing.  It&#039;s good for Johan Santana or David Wright to have a high reliability score, because that means the system is relatively sure that they will be superstar caliber players.  Someone like Alex Gordon, though?  Is it better for him to have a lower reliability score, since that would account for the possibility that he breaks out and has a monster season?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting.  I&#8217;m wondering how exactly you incorporated the reliability scores.  Did you multiply the dollar value by the reliability?  Or multiply everyone&#8217;s stat lines?</p>
<p>One other thought I had was making reliability a separate category, although would be some problems with that.</p>
<p>Reliability is a weird thing though, because as I understand it, having a higher reliability isn&#8217;t always a good thing.  It&#8217;s good for Johan Santana or David Wright to have a high reliability score, because that means the system is relatively sure that they will be superstar caliber players.  Someone like Alex Gordon, though?  Is it better for him to have a lower reliability score, since that would account for the possibility that he breaks out and has a monster season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

