In case you didn’t notice, Dan Szymborski released his ZiPS Projection Spreadsheet this weekend. ZiPS is a projection system that has been very successful in past seasons at forecasting players.
Dan has graciously allowed me to include the ZiPS projections as an option in the Price Guide, where they are available individually and mixed in with CHONE and CAIRO (Composite projections). If you find the ZiPS projections useful, I encourage you to donate a little to Dan to help keep these free. A ton of work goes into making these, and the only credit I can take is as a middle-man.
I’ve also recently updated the CAIRO projections to version 0.4 and CHONE to the freshest 2/28 spreadsheet. Throwing ZiPS in a blender with those two new releases gives a new look to our composite projections that admittedly makes me a little uncomfortable: Joe Mauer has moved into the #1 spot as the projected most valuable hitter for 2010. I think this is due to not only the quality difference between him and the last catcher picked, but also to a difference in quantity. The playing time adjustments indicate that good catchers play more often than bad catchers, even starting at DH or 1B on days they aren’t catching.
In a 1-catcher league, the difference is not as pronounced. But with two starting catchers, the combination of qualitative and quantitative advantages puts a huge gap between Mauer and guys like Ivan Rodriguez and Nick Hundley. I’d be interested if someone has any suggestions for making these rankings stick a little bit closer to reality.
Related posts:
Does ‘2010 Composite’ now mean ‘2010 Composite (Adj)’?
I just ran the Guide through my league settings (was curious to see the impact of ZIPS) and the results were similar to the adjusted numbers (which were quite different than the ‘original’ numbers).
Also, I have Mauer at #9 but we use OPS instead of AVG.
@Dave: Yes, I’ve taken off the unadjusted Composite in lieu of the one that is playing time adjusted. That’s mainly because I didn’t want to update both versions with all of these new releases.
Careful: Dan’s projections show a pitcher named Philip Aumont or something with 46 wins!
I tried to alert him on his site, but I’m not registered.
Bump up the minimum values for Catcher to the 17th best catcher in stead of the 20th best catcher in 2 C leagues.